College of Arts & Sciences at UMass Dartmouth

Winter 2025 Pass/Fail deadline ends for the 3-week session.

Online

Department of Fisheries Oceanography "Modeling Index Selectivity for Fishery Stock Assessments" By: Cole Carrano Advisor Steven X. Cadrin (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth) Committee Members Pingguo He (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth), Gavin Fay (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth), Lisa Kerr (University of Maine) Monday January 6th, 2025 10:00 AM SMAST East 101-103 836 S. Rodney French Blvd, New Bedford and via Zoom Abstract: Abundance indices are crucial components of fishery stock assessments because they provide a time series of relative abundance for estimating absolute stock size, derived from the response of relative indices to the absolute magnitude of fishery removals. Selectivity is the relative vulnerability to a fishery or fishery-independent survey for each species or demographic group within a species (e.g., size or age class). In an age-based assessment model, selectivity parameters are needed to relate observed stock indices to model estimates of abundance at age. Thus, selectivity estimates must be carefully modeled to ensure an accurate depiction of the stock's age structure. The objectives of this research are to improve the accuracy and utilization of indices in fisheries stock assessment models by understanding the effect of alternative approaches to estimating index selectivity. Chapter One provides a general introduction to the topic and a review of the relevant literature. Chapter Two involves splitting a fishery-independent survey into two series to account for vessel and methodological changes by estimating distinct catchability and selectivity parameters for each series. Results indicated improvement in model performance for stocks with sufficient contrast in the new index, and no improvement for stocks with limited years of data or contrast in the recent indices. Chapter Three develops fleet-structured assessment models to improve selectivity estimates for fishery and the fishery-dependent indices. Splitting catch into fleets improves selectivity estimates for respective CPUE indices, but robust catch-at-age data is desirable for fleets that make up a large portion of the total catch. Chapter Four involves simulation cross-testing as a method to evaluate performance of assessments that assume a single index series that is calibrated for changes in survey technology vs. assuming separate indices in stock assessment models. Results from this chapter suggest that the consequences of assuming a split when there truly wasn't one were not severe, but that assuming there wasn't a split when there truly was one can produce significant biases in model results This work examines how decisions about modeling fleet structure or changes in survey systems affect the performance of an assessment model and how sensitive models are to these decisions. This research will emphasize the importance of selectivity estimates to stock assessment and advance our understanding of how to effectively utilize abundance indices in an assessment model. ************ Join Zoom Meeting https://umassd.zoom.us/j/94890073016 Note: Meeting passcode required, email contact below to receive ************** To request the Zoom passcode or for any other questions, please email Callie Rumbut at c.rumbut@umassd.edu

See description for location

Winter 2025 Course Withdrawal period (grade of a W) ends for the Accelerated Nursing 1 session.

Online

Department of Fisheries Oceanography "Portfolio Theory: an Important Tool For Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management" By: Fiona Edwards Advisor: Steven X. Cadrin (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth) Committee Members Gavin Fay (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth), Lauran Brewster (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth), Jason Link (National Marine Fisheries Service) Thursday January 9th, 2025 1pm SMAST East 101-103 836 S. Rodney French Blvd, New Bedford and via Zoom Abstract: Traditional single-species fisheries management does not account for multi-species interactions and has not always performed well for avoiding overfishing or rebuilding many fisheries. Considering these interactions has become increasingly important for effectively managing fisheries because of climate change and divergent stock trends. Ecosystem-based fishery management (EBFM) is a more holistic approach to fisheries management which has gained traction over the last several decades. EBFM considers the biological, physical, and social-economic components which may influence fisheries. Implementing EBFM requires new tactics that can be informed by interdisciplinary research. One way risk associated with achieving a target reward has been analyzed in the finance field analysis is through portfolio optimization whereby the financial risk of a portfolio is minimized for given levels of return based on portfolio covariance. A set of fishery stocks landing values can be analyzed similarly to a set of financial assets in an investment portfolio. In this study, a candidate fisheries portfolio is analyzed for New England demersal species caught in the same fisheries. The sensitivity of this portfolio to data decisions such as species composition and time series length is investigated by developing efficient frontiers for different sets of fishery stocks and different time periods. Efficient frontiers were developed using portfolio optimization techniques from the finance field and adding harvest constraints to account for limits on harvesting in fisheries. Sensitivity analyses showed that risk estimates were sensitive to both species exclusion and time series selection. Examination of the changes in the frontiers to different periods of the time series characterized by regional shifts in management strategy allowed for evaluation of the degree of flexibility afforded to fishers during these times. Efficient frontier analyses based upon historic landings data indicated that the same target revenue could have been achieved with less or similar risk had a portfolio approach to management been taken for these species. Portfolio effects as applied to fisheries management can provide additional catch stability through increased diversification of multispecies fisheries and can reduce the risk of foregone revenue, all of which make it an important tool to consider for implementing EBFM. Join Zoom Meeting https://umassd.zoom.us/j/94065204146 Note: Meeting passcode required. To request the Zoom passcode or for any other questions, please email Callie Rumbut at c.rumbut@umassd.edu

See description for location

Winter 2025 Course Withdrawal period (grade of a W) ends for the 3-week session.

Online

Location: ROOM 374, LARTS, College of Arts & Sciences If you prefer to attend via zoom: Join Zoom Meeting https://umassd.zoom.us/j/93469055850?pwd=woZj412TF2VP7RiH7QfCsskPCnOtTH.1 Meeting ID: 934 6905 5850 Passcode: 834205 Title: Anger-Related Cognitive Processes and Affect: Considering Context Misperceptions to Understand Aggression Abstract: Use of aggression among undergraduates has demonstrated associations with negative mental and physical health outcomes. Evaluating factors which may influence aggressive tendencies is a promising approach to understand how individuals may be primed to utilize aggression. With this, the present study examined cognitive and affective factors which may impact the perception of situational context and ultimately predispose individuals to act aggressively. As such, it was expected that the relationship between anger rumination and aggression would be mediated serially by hostile attribution bias (HAB) and context-incongruent (CI) anger. Furthermore, as unique types of aggression can be utilized to exploit different outcomes, it was hypothesized that for those who ruminate, becoming angry in particular contexts (i.e., in threatening contexts [CIT anger] or in positive contexts [CIP anger]) may relate more strongly to one function of aggression over another. This study included a sample of 137 undergraduate students who completed assessments examining anger rumination, HAB, CI anger, context-congruent (CC) anger, and reactive and proactive aggression. Mediation analyses were completed to test the proposed hypotheses. As expected, HAB and CI anger individually mediated the relationship between anger rumination and aggression; this was not true for the serial mediation including both HAB and CI anger as mediators. Notably, substituting CC anger into this model did not result in significant findings. An alternative serial mediation model (i.e., anger rumination and CI anger mediating between HAB and aggression) did yield a significant serial mediation. As hypothesized, CIT anger, but not CIP anger, mediated between anger rumination and reactive aggression. Unexpectedly, CIP anger did not mediate between anger rumination and proactive aggression, but CIT anger did. These findings accentuate that together, anger-related cognitions and affect (particularly that which is seemingly incongruent with contextual cues) are associated with aggression among young adults. Results warrant further exploration and may be useful particularly in clinical settings. Advisor: Dr. Robin Arkerson Committee Members: Dr. Judith Sims-Knight, Dr. Ted Powers For additional information, please contact Verna Drayton at vdrayton@umassd.edu or 508-999-8380

See description for location